Hello,
When i have problem with starting the PCInstaller i check the Computer Browser Service. Check if is stopped and start it.
Adrian
Search found 53 matches
- 08 May 2017 04:45
- Forum: MAIN
- Topic: pc installer
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3135
- 17 Mar 2016 14:19
- Forum: MAIN
- Topic: Table SUBSDATEM
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3241
Re: Table SUBSDATEM
Hi guys, Thanks for answers. Indeed it's not normal that this index file to be so big and it was the cause of 1542 incident. I use fichges recover subsdate command (rebuild only index file) and then everything was OK as should be: (1101)xb011001> ll -h | grep SUBSDATE -rw-r--r-- 1 mtcl tel 500K Mar ...
- 16 Mar 2016 06:10
- Forum: Other Alcatel-Lucent tools
- Topic: AVISO - Voip Assesment Tool and UAIP SoftPhone
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9534
Re: AVISO - Voip Assesment Tool and UAIP SoftPhone
Hello,
Seems nobody. Meanwhile I opened an eSR to ALE and received a newer version of AVISO which is working perfectly with the IPDSoftPhone.
BR,
Adrian
Seems nobody. Meanwhile I opened an eSR to ALE and received a newer version of AVISO which is working perfectly with the IPDSoftPhone.
BR,
Adrian
- 16 Mar 2016 05:56
- Forum: MAIN
- Topic: Table SUBSDATEM
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3241
Table SUBSDATEM
Hello guys, Do you know what is for the table SUBDATEM? I have an incident 1542 as usr3 exceeded 93% and after i checked /usr3/mao i found this table for which the idx table is quite big: (1101)xa011001> ll -h -S | grep SUB -rw-r--r-- 1 mtcl tel 619M Mar 16 10:55 SUBSDATEM.idx -rw-r--r-- 1 mtcl tel ...
- 06 Oct 2015 07:06
- Forum: Other Alcatel-Lucent tools
- Topic: AVISO - Voip Assesment Tool and UAIP SoftPhone
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9534
AVISO - Voip Assesment Tool and UAIP SoftPhone
Hello, There any of you worked in the last period with AVISO ? In release 3.0 it's written that we can use IPDSoftPhone. I made to work with release 11.x but after a session we don't see the result in Report module. If i'm using IPTouch phones then everything look ok. The strange is that after a man...
- 28 Jul 2015 17:31
- Forum: SIP
- Topic: Connecting an AVM Fritz!box 7490 to an OxE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4314
Re: Connecting an AVM Fritz!box 7490 to an OxE
Oky,
I trust you
.
Trying to help....
Good luck.
Adrian
I trust you

Trying to help....
Good luck.
Adrian
- 28 Jul 2015 03:53
- Forum: SIP
- Topic: Connecting an AVM Fritz!box 7490 to an OxE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4314
Re: Connecting an AVM Fritz!box 7490 to an OxE
Hello,
For "when the extension is set up as a SIP extension, as a SIP device the OxE releases the call @ about 5 seconds (during these periods thought the speech is fine)" i believe that your box don't send ACK after 200 OK.
But for all cases you have to attach also some traces.
BR
Adrian
For "when the extension is set up as a SIP extension, as a SIP device the OxE releases the call @ about 5 seconds (during these periods thought the speech is fine)" i believe that your box don't send ACK after 200 OK.
But for all cases you have to attach also some traces.
BR
Adrian
- 22 Apr 2014 03:15
- Forum: Boards
- Topic: INTOF2 Trouble
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9046
Re: INTOF2 Trouble
Hello,
There is any impact for the users?
I'm opening an eSR but want to know if till i will have an answer to try to update or not the binary provided by Elliot.
Thanks,
Adrian
There is any impact for the users?
I'm opening an eSR but want to know if till i will have an answer to try to update or not the binary provided by Elliot.
Thanks,
Adrian
- 19 Mar 2014 11:24
- Forum: Inter-Node Links
- Topic: Broadcast issues between R11 and R9.1
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2949
Broadcast issues between R11 and R9.1
Hello, We have 2 nodes: one in R9.1 (i1.605.31) and one in R11(k1.400.30.f) configured on ABCF network on IP. Everything is working less the broadcast, which is going ok from node with release R9.1 to R11 but from R11 to R9.1 no. In broadcast history on node with release 9.1 we can see the error: .....
- 25 Jul 2013 06:20
- Forum: Classes of Services
- Topic: Prefix Secret Identity
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5493
Re: Prefix Secret Identity
Hello,
Solved. The problem is in release 9.1 patch 33. Normally this facility can be used only with a key defined on the set not as prefix.
Thanks
Solved. The problem is in release 9.1 patch 33. Normally this facility can be used only with a key defined on the set not as prefix.
Thanks