faulty beam

[DjeSan]

ok
is the discriminator 1 in node 2is well managed as in node 1 ,real disc , logic disc, entity etc .. ?
trkgp 10 is it declared in node 2 ? see above.

Node Number (reserved) : 1 x
x Trunk Group ID : 1936 x
x x
x Trunk Group Type + T2 x
x Trunk Group Name : welcome to SIP world x
x UTF-8 Trunk Group Name : --------------------------------------- x
x Number Compatible With : -1 x
x Remote Network : 13 x
x Shared Trunk Group + False x
x Special Services + Nothing x
x Node number : 1


Node Number (reserved) : 2 x
x Trunk Group ID : 1936 x
x x
x Trunk Group Type + T2 x
x Trunk Group Name : Welcome to SIP World x
x UTF-8 Trunk Group Name : --------------------------------------- x
x Number Compatible With : -1 x
x Remote Network : 13 x
x Shared Trunk Group + False x
x Special Services + Nothing x
x Node number : 1

why do you put the number 13 in "Remote Network: 13"?
apart from that, everything else is as in your configuration example

for same reason that you put remote network in node 1 equal to 10
when we use sip isdn or abcf it's mandotary to use remote network as # ip domains and adresses can needed in external sip gateway config
Node Number (reserved) : 1 x
x Instance (reserved) : 1 x
x Network Number : 13 x
x x
x Rank of First Digit to be Sent : 1 x
x Incoming identification prefix : -------- x
x Protocol Type + Dependant on Trunk Group Type x
x Numbering Plan Descriptor ID : 11 x
x ARS Route list : 3 x
x Schedule number : -1 x
x ATM Address ID : -1 x
x Network call prefix : -------- x
x City/Town Name : -------------------- x
x Send City/Town Name + False x
x Associated Ext SIP gateway : 3 x
x Enable UTF8 name sending + True x
x

okay haroun I'm really trying to keep up with you so in the end I have to change :
1 - the number of node 2 ( replace the number 1 by 0 ) to be similar to node 1
2 - at the level of ARS routing of node 2, I must change the beam number ( instead of 16 put 10 ) and also the N0 of command table num change to also put 10
3 - and finally modify node 2's tkgp 10 by adding Network number: 13 and associated Ext SIP Gateway: 3 as in your example.
is this correct?

[DjeSan]

I'm a bit confused should I delete the tkgp 10 on node 2 and recreate it? or the one on node 1?
I'm trying a lot of manipulations here but nothing happens.

[haroun]

i can post the config ?!

[haroun]

of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"

[haroun]

can u post your ip networking config
by this command
netadmin -m
select option 2

(1)pst_cpu6> netadmin -m

Alcatel-Lucent e-Mediate IP Network Administration
==================================================


2. 'Show current configuration'
'


0. 'Quit'

What is your choice ? 2

Your system has the private network number 0 and the site number 1.

node name : pst_n1
internal name resolver activated : yes


Ethernet interface setup
========================

Netmask : 255.255.255.192

[DjeSan]

of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"

Hello, thank you very much Haroun, may God bless you! It's very clear, I'm just afraid of deleting configurations that have been there for years and fear that they won't work at all.
I'm going to ask my superior if it's possible to do it.

[DjeSan]

can u post your ip networking config
by this command
netadmin -m
select option 2

(1)pst_cpu6> netadmin -m

Alcatel-Lucent e-Mediate IP Network Administration
==================================================


2. 'Show current configuration'
'


0. 'Quit'

What is your choice ? 2

Your system has the private network number 0 and the site number 1.

node name : pst_n1
internal name resolver activated : yes


Ethernet interface setup
========================

Netmask : 255.255.255.192

"Your system has the private network number 0 and the site number 0."
here's the netadmin configuration! is it consistent with yours?
and i have another question, which software lock will allow me to set this up? i'm just wondering if i have the necessary licence to do this.

[DjeSan]

of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"

in your configuration of node 1 you mention an ars server, but we don't have one

[haroun]

of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"

in your configuration of node 1 you mention an ars server, but we don't have one

my bad ! in reality i meant configuration without ars server option.
so your node 1 has the site number 0 so trkgp 10 attachement should be node N°0 it's correct under siege and wrong under Base traveaux


"by DjeSan » 18 Jan 2024 09:29

haroun wrote: ↑17 Jan 2024 16:06
of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"
Hello, thank you very much Haroun, may God bless you! It's very clear, I'm just afraid of deleting configurations that have been there for years and fear that they won't work at all.
I'm going to ask my superior if it's possible to do it."

i think you have only to do modification and no need to delete or recreate any thing

[DjeSan]

of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"

in your configuration of node 1 you mention an ars server, but we don't have one

my bad ! in reality i meant configuration without ars server option.
so your node 1 has the site number 0 so trkgp 10 attachement should be node N°0 it's correct under siege and wrong under Base traveaux


"by DjeSan » 18 Jan 2024 09:29

haroun wrote: ↑17 Jan 2024 16:06
of corse don't forget the " Liste des routes temporelles"
Hello, thank you very much Haroun, may God bless you! It's very clear, I'm just afraid of deleting configurations that have been there for years and fear that they won't work at all.
I'm going to ask my superior if it's possible to do it."

i think you have only to do modification and no need to delete or recreate any thing

hi haroun so when i try to create another cluster i get an error message " Clusters::1936 Lock 185(SIP Gateway):Software protection error" i think i don't have a licence on node 2 to create a sip cluster and it is impossible to modify the node numbers already created and the same for the " Q931 Signal variant " modification impossible
so I would like to know if there is another way to be able to route calls from node 2 through node 1?
thank you very much