Port Mobility Issue
Posted: 13 Feb 2015 15:49
Hi everyone. I'd like your support trying to explain why happened this following anomalous behavior.
Our end customer has a stack of four OS6400 with version 6.4.5.516.R01. They have configured port 1/31 as follows for mobility:
vlan 4 mac 00:1b:21:58:a3:86
vlan port mobile 1/31
vlan port 1/31 default vlan restore disable
vlan port 1/31 default vlan disable
With this configuration we're expecting that just the customer with mac address 00:1b:21:58:a3:86 will be assign vlan 4, but this customer reported that had limited connectivity. The administrator of the network sent me the evidence that I attached here.
From this evidence I see that the output of the command show mac-address-table 1/31 displays the mac 00:1b:21:58:a3:86 assigned to vlan 200 that It's the default vlan configured. This behavior is anomalous. But the output of the command show vlan port 1/31 displays vlan 4 assigned to this port and forwarding state, so this is confusing.
I hope I was clear with my explanation, if don't, please ask me anything.
Thanks
Our end customer has a stack of four OS6400 with version 6.4.5.516.R01. They have configured port 1/31 as follows for mobility:
vlan 4 mac 00:1b:21:58:a3:86
vlan port mobile 1/31
vlan port 1/31 default vlan restore disable
vlan port 1/31 default vlan disable
With this configuration we're expecting that just the customer with mac address 00:1b:21:58:a3:86 will be assign vlan 4, but this customer reported that had limited connectivity. The administrator of the network sent me the evidence that I attached here.
From this evidence I see that the output of the command show mac-address-table 1/31 displays the mac 00:1b:21:58:a3:86 assigned to vlan 200 that It's the default vlan configured. This behavior is anomalous. But the output of the command show vlan port 1/31 displays vlan 4 assigned to this port and forwarding state, so this is confusing.
I hope I was clear with my explanation, if don't, please ask me anything.
Thanks