Parallel Ringing on 2 sets in Network
Posted: 01 Feb 2015 00:52
Hi,
I have three extns.A,B & C. My requirement is when I pick receiver of extn.A call should imeediately goto extn.B & C simultaneously(Parallel Ring).
1. Extn. A & B are on same node while C is on different node.
2. Both nodes are in same network but different node nos.
3. Both sites have R9.1 i1.605.29 release.
4. Extn. A is Analog while B & C are IPTOUCH 4068 with Multi-Line facility.
5. I thought of creating a Parallel Hunt group and assigning that hunt group no. in Routing Table and mapping routing table to user but since, Parallel Hunt group do not work in Network so this option is obsolete.
6. Also, we cant assign multiple nos. in single Routing Table so this option is also obsolete.
7. Extn. B is created as Station in node-2 & extn.C is created as Station in node-1.
8. Extn.B is Associated to Voicemail but Extn.A & C are not.
9. I tried mentioning extn.B in Routing Table & extn.C as Tandem in extn.B but I got an error "Object-1 Tandem:INvalid Attribute Value".
So, any other solution to this problem??
I have three extns.A,B & C. My requirement is when I pick receiver of extn.A call should imeediately goto extn.B & C simultaneously(Parallel Ring).
1. Extn. A & B are on same node while C is on different node.
2. Both nodes are in same network but different node nos.
3. Both sites have R9.1 i1.605.29 release.
4. Extn. A is Analog while B & C are IPTOUCH 4068 with Multi-Line facility.
5. I thought of creating a Parallel Hunt group and assigning that hunt group no. in Routing Table and mapping routing table to user but since, Parallel Hunt group do not work in Network so this option is obsolete.
6. Also, we cant assign multiple nos. in single Routing Table so this option is also obsolete.
7. Extn. B is created as Station in node-2 & extn.C is created as Station in node-1.
8. Extn.B is Associated to Voicemail but Extn.A & C are not.
9. I tried mentioning extn.B in Routing Table & extn.C as Tandem in extn.B but I got an error "Object-1 Tandem:INvalid Attribute Value".
So, any other solution to this problem??