Alcatel Unleashed

I created set supervision keys with the option " short ring without overinging" on 4 different sets to see the incoming calls of each phone. all users are configured exact identical. but only for calls for one user it is working correct. calls to the 3 other users are presented as if the keys are configured with the option "no ring". the key shows that the phone is ringing, but no ring and number shown in the displays. There are several of these groups working fine. I´ve recreated the keys, i´ve deleted the whole user and created them again... no change...
are there any limitations for supervion keys with short ring??
Release of the oxe is Rel 6.1 / f250226

I remember there was a limit of 20 supervisons per user.

That's the only restriction in my mind for the moment.

I can't edit my posting here

Supervisions per Node: 15.000
Supervision keys per set: Limited by number of keys on set
Supervisors for one DN: 20
Supervised sets: No limit

But you could check your tables using the command: multitool CHECK REPAIR

Eliott wrote:I can't edit my posting here

Why? an error? A limitation?

cavagnaro wrote:

Eliott wrote:I can't edit my posting here

Why? an error? A limitation?

Appears to be a limitation Señor Cav.

I've just looked at a post I made earlier today and there is no 'EDIT' option like there used to be

knightr1der wrote:

cavagnaro wrote:

Eliott wrote:I can't edit my posting here

Why? an error? A limitation?

Appears to be a limitation Señor Cav.

I've just looked at a post I made earlier today and there is no 'EDIT' option like there used to be

Muchas gracias caballero, lol.
I'll check it.
By the way, is limitation bad written?

Sorry guys, it's fixed now, you should be able to edit your own posts.

cavagnaro wrote:
By the way, is limitation bad written?

no - limitation is not badly written. But the question should be "Is 'limitation' written badly (or incorrectly)"? LOL

tenga un buen fin de semana mi amigo

knightr1der wrote:

cavagnaro wrote:
By the way, is limitation bad written?

no - limitation is not badly written. But the question should be "Is 'limitation' written badly (or incorrectly)"? LOL

tenga un buen fin de semana mi amigo

ok thanks

Returning to the main subject of this post, any news alexeik with Eliott ideas?

thanks for the idea, i will try it...

... and i wondered why so many replys^^