Problem with set supervision

alexeik
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: 26 Apr 2007 10:47
Location: Bad Oeynhausen, germany

Problem with set supervision

Post by alexeik »

I created set supervision keys with the option " short ring without overinging" on 4 different sets to see the incoming calls of each phone. all users are configured exact identical. but only for calls for one user it is working correct. calls to the 3 other users are presented as if the keys are configured with the option "no ring". the key shows that the phone is ringing, but no ring and number shown in the displays. There are several of these groups working fine. I´ve recreated the keys, i´ve deleted the whole user and created them again... no change...
are there any limitations for supervion keys with short ring??
Release of the oxe is Rel 6.1 / f250226
Eliott_DUP

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by Eliott_DUP »

I remember there was a limit of 20 supervisons per user.

That's the only restriction in my mind for the moment.
Eliott_DUP

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by Eliott_DUP »

I can't edit my posting here :(

Supervisions per Node: 15.000
Supervision keys per set: Limited by number of keys on set
Supervisors for one DN: 20
Supervised sets: No limit

But you could check your tables using the command: multitool CHECK REPAIR
cavagnaro

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by cavagnaro »

Eliott wrote:I can't edit my posting here :(
Why? an error? A limitation?
knightr1der

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by knightr1der »

cavagnaro wrote:
Eliott wrote:I can't edit my posting here :(
Why? an error? A limitation?
Appears to be a limitation Señor Cav.

I've just looked at a post I made earlier today and there is no 'EDIT' option like there used to be :(
cavagnaro

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by cavagnaro »

knightr1der wrote:
cavagnaro wrote:
Eliott wrote:I can't edit my posting here :(
Why? an error? A limitation?
Appears to be a limitation Señor Cav.

I've just looked at a post I made earlier today and there is no 'EDIT' option like there used to be :(
Muchas gracias caballero, lol.
I'll check it.
By the way, is limitation bad written?
User avatar
frank
Alcatel Unleashed Certified Guru
Alcatel Unleashed Certified Guru
Posts: 3386
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 00:18
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by frank »

Sorry guys, it's fixed now, you should be able to edit your own posts.
Code Free Or Die
knightr1der

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by knightr1der »

cavagnaro wrote:
By the way, is limitation bad written?
no - limitation is not badly written. But the question should be "Is 'limitation' written badly (or incorrectly)"? LOL

tenga un buen fin de semana mi amigo :wink:
cavagnaro

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by cavagnaro »

knightr1der wrote:
cavagnaro wrote:
By the way, is limitation bad written?
no - limitation is not badly written. But the question should be "Is 'limitation' written badly (or incorrectly)"? LOL

tenga un buen fin de semana mi amigo :wink:
ok thanks :)

Returning to the main subject of this post, any news alexeik with Eliott ideas?
alexeik
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: 26 Apr 2007 10:47
Location: Bad Oeynhausen, germany

Re: Problem with set supervision

Post by alexeik »

thanks for the idea, i will try it...

... and i wondered why so many replys^^
Post Reply

Return to “Users”