Calling number modification?!

[Billy]

My outgoing TG had no DID rules, I used Number-to-add = "A" and then Speed Dial entries like A3803664 => B001, where B001 was the client's TG seizure.
Will try now!

[Billy]

No, no luck.
Outgoing call from user's TG falls on 2 routes - one TDM (default), one SIP. Both trunks get no Caller ID at all on transit call.
I set DID rules for both NPD's for both TG's.
I do receive the CID from the user's TG if I trace this TG on an outgoing call, but then the number gets TOTALLY lost somewhere. If I was calling from an EXTENSION that has no Private Caller Number, it would give out an Extension number at least...

[Billy]

Hey, found one more strange thing.
If I set "Public DID Transcoding=YES" in the client's TG NPD selector, he can't dial out anything. The trace is:

Code: Select all

 ______________________________________________________________________________
| (020537:000011) Concatenated-Physical-Event :
| long: 42  desti: 0  source: 0  cryst: 1  cpl: 5  us: 0  term: 0  type a5
| tei: 0  >>>>  message received : SETUP [05]    Call ref :  5f a2
|______________________________________________________________________________
|
| IE:[04] BEARER_CAPABILITY (l=3) 90 90 a3
| IE:[18] CHANNEL (l=3)  a9 83 8f -> T2 : B channel 15 exclusive
| IE:[1e] PROGRESS_ID (l=2) 81 83
| IE:[6c] CALLING_NUMBER (l=8)  ->  c1  Num : 3803664
|______________________________________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________________________
| (020537:000012) 1098: Send_IO1 (link-nbr=1, sapi=0, tei=0) :
| long: 23  desti: 0  source: 15  cryst: 1  cpl: 5  us: 8  term: 0  type a5
| tei: 0  <<<<  message sent : REL COMP [5a]  Call ref :  df a2
|______________________________________________________________________________
|
| IE:[08] CAUSE (l=3) 81 81 80 -> [81] UNALLOCATED NUMBER
|______________________________________________________________________________

[vad]

Nothing need to do with incoming TG.
About DID we say only for outgoing Tg. For NPD used for OUTGOING call you need DID rules (in outgoing TG or ARS route) - Calling_number_what_you_want-3803664 (if we say about NPD without installation number.

[Billy]

vad, NO number arrives to DID. Either throug ARS or through prefix. It gets lost somewhere in between. I must've done something wrong, but WHAT???
Even deleted the TG, recreated it with default params, no luck. TG=Public - number travels unchanged; TG=Private - NO NUMBER at all.
Any other ideas?

[vad]

If you create INTERNAL OXE user with number 3803664 and entity = entity in private TG local parameters - do you have CALLING number for outgoing external calls?

[Billy]

I guess yes! I have several internal users, and all of them send their extension numbers to the outgoing trunk - unless I assign them Personal Calling Id's. Right as documented.
Moreover, I have created a user named 3803664 earlier today! But didn't try to call out - I was hoping just to fool the DID. Will not work

[Billy]

Yes, I've created an ANALOG user 3803664. When calling from it outside, the calling number is properly modified by DID, and everything goes correct - just like in docs.
The Private trunk behaves with no change... No number seen. What can I change somewhere? I'm not a pro, so I could have forgotten something dumb and simpe...

[vad]

1) TG=private, Network mode=yes?
2) with internal user 3803664 - Ok, entity in user 3803664 parameters= entity in private TG local parameters?
3) when you have call (with Calling number=3803664) from private TG to internal OXE user (digital wit display) (not transit call, just incoming) - displayed number 3803664? Or something else - f.e. B3803664

[Billy]

1) yes, yes.
2) yes, same entity 10, disc=3, both logical and physical, ARS works identically.
3) No, it shows the TG name (testgroup) on 4035.